Member Profile
| Name | dylan terreri, i |
|---|---|
| Joined | 285 days ago |
| About Me | mike phelps spawned the use of my pool. i had it since 2004, never used it until 2008 when mike phelps became a household name. it's all because of him that i use my pool. i wrote a parody of kelly clarkson's "because of you" in honor of him. :) i've written over 700 parodies, mostly politically-incorrect, they're all at my website, songparody.org. oh, the url in the picture also gets you to the same site. |
---------------------
email: to.be.or.not.to.be.green@michelleobama.name
---------------------
ANOTHER GREEN ESSAY FROM to be or not to be green
"VALLEY VETERINARY HOSPITAL" IS NOT SEXIST
---------------------
this "green" letter, environmentally-friendly because no paper was used in its creation or distribution, is meant to justify the legitimacy of any green business which has an all-female workforce. it was inspired by a green letter/petition that i had found online which (quite unfairly) singled out one pet hospital (which must be surrounded by the beautiful green mountains of my childhood hometown). since this essay is not about the hospital, since the essay is only inspired by someone who had written about the hospital, i will refer to and regard the hospital (and all pet hospitals) only as "valley veterinary hospital".
i will proceed to say that the "valley veterinary hospital" is being singled out by the petition/letter for what is claimed as "sexist hiring practices" regarding a workforce of 13 females and 0 men. i am writing this green letter in defense of every green business, including the green "valley veterinary hospital" (well, i hope that the hospital is green) which has a workforce consisting entirely of Strong Women...whether they are "green ladies" or not
i have found that the aforementioned green petition is currently posted at TWO websites, linked below
-----
pghcitypaper.com/pittsburgh/chillin-dylan/Profile?oid=160...8910 and .change.org/petitions/boycott-green-valley-veterinary-hospital-for-their-blatant-sexism-stop-being-sexist-in-your-hiring-practices
-----
first off, i must state that from nevada to pennsylvania and from montana to louisiana, i have seen plenty of all-female staffs - it's nothing new. let me repeat that: i have seen plenty of all-female staffs, it's nothing new
brighton sheffield, if i may bring up a television show watched while on a pennsylvania ski-vacation near pittsburgh, didn't have a problem walking into his home to find females everywhere. his father was simply holding auditions for showgirls. i realize that there is a difference between an all-female ensemble of showgirls and an all-female staff at a hospital. i realize that showgirls need to be female while hospital workers don't. i realize that showgirls are required to have somewhat large and protruding mammary glands, as well as small-enough builds to fit into tiny bikinis or petite, leopard-skin tights and bras. i realize that men cannot be hired as showgirls because mens' lack of milk-producing mammary glands, paired with their larger builds and broader shoulders, just wouldn't allow them to properly fit into the "showgirl" attire which was designed for the bodies that are smaller and more breakable. i also realize that the female gender is what men with any sense of masculine gender-identity would want to see at a "burlesque" type of show. i realize that the majority of men don't want to see other men dancing around in skimpy attire at a "burlesque" show, but i can understand how the writer of the above-linked petition would not expect the environment of a strip club to present itself at a veterinary hospital. i'm sure that the writer expected a bit more of professionalism on display at the hospital - professionalism which, in today's society, would be representative of both genders
so, given that i can understand where "chillin dylan" finds grounds to complain about an all-female staff (be it at a green "valley vet" or at a green "hillside neurosurgeon"), i still think that he is wrong to regard any all-female staff as sexist. i am a feminist, though, so maybe my thoughts should be taken with a grain of salt
i do not agree with "chillin dylan" (or anyone else) who thinks that an entire staff consisting of one gender makes the whole business a mark of sexism i have not spoken to any members of any all-female staff, but i'm sure that sexism is not the reason that the female owner of any green organization would go and hire 12 more members of her own gender. i can't be sure that the attitudes of all 13 females who work at any green "valley vet" would be as wholesome as the whole "green" movement is, but the apparent lack of gender-diversity displayed at any business with an all-female workforce does not a legitimate charge of sexism make. it takes more than an entire workforce being comprised of one gender to justify sexist attitudes and/or ideals, does it not? of course it does
i'd hate to mention my personal feelings in this letter, only because it would seem like i am trying to justify what the writer of the above-linked petition ("chillin dylan" or "dylan terreri, i") regards as sexism, but isn't it about time that us Strongwomen are taken seriously? for far too long, men have been the heads of companies and the heads of state, so isn't it time that we, AS WOMEN, justify our abilities as competent enough to do anything a man's abilities can do? isn't it time that we take the "girls' clubs" and replace the "boys' clubs," isn't it time that we bring the concept of gender-based sports teams into the workforce? we base sports teams on gender because the little men can't keep up (or even compete) with the physical strength/speed/ability/endurance of the females, so it's only about time that womens' physical prowess is acknowledged and promoted in the workforce as well as on the field. it's only about time that any green "valley veterinary hospital" - or, for that matter, any environmentally-unfriendly "valley veterinary hospital" - hires 13 females and 0 men. and extra kudos if any "valley veterinary hospital" is a green "valley veterinary hospital"...because green makes everything better
now, in addition to regarding any veterinary hospital's staff of 13 females and 0 men as sexist, the petition/letter also gets into a LOT of degradation of the female gender. not degradation of any green veterinary doctors, just degradation of the female gender. it has come to my attention that the letter-writer has a website called strongwomen.info, in which he degrades the female gender as the shorter and lighter, less-wide and weaker gender. he degrades women as being "green with envy" with regards to masculine superiority. let me quote a page from his website: "men on the top or the bottom, the vagina can only submit and therefore can only be seen as a valley that's green with envy with regards to the big mountains surrounding it". it's like he thinks that mountain-sized men aren't green with envy of feminine superiority. it seems he can't stress enough that the reason females bleed eggs downstairs and spurt milk upstairs is because we were designed for motherhood. while i do not support this, i guess that degradation of females must be allowed if us STRONG WOMEN can write poetry about feminists castrating men (and also have the poems read and embraced at different colleges throughout the country). also, he has another domain - mutilation.biz - which features "poetry" about castrating feminists' mammary glands (he refers to them as MOMmary glands), but i'm just glad that his writings about mutilating females are less popular than feminists' writings about mutilating men are
in closing, i will say that after reading the above-linked petition/letter, i simply had to express my feelings. i had to express my feelings about the legitimacy of a veterinary office (or any workplace) consisting of 13 females and 0 men. it's not sexist, that's the bottom-line. IF IT'S GREEN, IT'S GOOD. either way, 13 females and 0 men is NOT a mark of sexism
thank you for reading,
ms. geraldine (ms. geraldgreen)
-----------------
C
O
P
Y
-
P
A
S
T
E
-
E
N
D
S
---------------
"i am newly-divorced and i am starting life a new
brighton, will you marry me - i'm
calling out for you"
"i love your heartfelt kisses, yours is the flesh that i lust
brighton, i am 68 - you
might just be the 1"
"i used to love bob novak, yes, and kaufman was my groom
brighton, i was just 17
22 was you"
tim burton was your uncle, and his old house you had bought
brighton burton, marry me, i'll
clean that burton-hall"
"i'll clean that burton-bedroom, i'll clean that burton-den
brighton burton, marry me and
i will be your pet"
"no, i am not a maureen...or moron or ashamed
brighton burton, i'm kristin - please
let me share your name"
"i'll clean that burton-hall and i'll clean that burton-den
brighton burton-mcelhinny,
don't make me lay eggs"
"i want your sperm inside me, a babe-machine i am
brighton burton, make your baby
take me cuz you can"
-----------------
C
O
P
Y
-
P
A
S
T
E
-
B
E
G
I
N
S
A COMPLAINT ABOUT A VETERINARY HOSPITAL WHICH DROPPED ME AS A CLIENT FOR MY MOCKING AS "SEXIST," THEIR STAFF OF 13 WOMBN AND NO MEN.
i am the webmaster of "www.strongwomen.info," i do not have a problem with females, i have a problem with females being marketed to society as man's equal - as a society, i don't understand why we ignore the sexism that 75% of females are guilty of supporting - let me mention the "woman-owned" businesses like "sonjara, inc." and the moving companies with a workforce consisting ENTIRELY of the shorter gender of broads who have no broad shoulders and whose lack of ability has given us gender-based sports teams and gender-based military requirements (as well as gender-based olympic games and gender-based "do it HERself" workshops at the homo depot) - what about the "a woman can do anything a man can do" line, why are so many things gender-based if the vaginas are as competent as men are?
are females allowed to be sexist and flaunt their "woman-owned" businesses, just because a competent female is a novelty? does society forgive the "green envy" of the "strong woman" (who can't budge 100 pounds) by condoning females' sexist attitudes simply because females have always been seen as valleys in relation to men being seen as mountains? with the "strongwoman" propaganda, is a woman trying to hide the fact that she is a "green valley," an envious vagina who is spiteful of men being mountain-sized in comparison to her? oh, the valley/mountain mention is NOT relating to reproductive organs, though it could be - a penis is a tall mountain to a vagina which is a flatland with a little valley-like indentation
i am just your average man - phvsically stronger than most vaginas, yet weaker than half of other healthy and active men - i am your average man, i go to mcdonalds and walmart often - i am your average man, i've lived everywhere - from a smog-filled, brown city to a clean, green valley
veterinary hospitals i have been to, whether brown city pet-hostels or a green valley vet, have never given me a problem - until now - i am even thinking of changing my name from dylan to something new
brighton, maybe, or joel or craig or joshua - i want to change my name before i am 68 years old - before i am living in an old folks home in ohio (cleveland or boardman or niles)...or even somewhere in western pennsylvania
i want to change my name because i have been given a bad name by a certain veterinary hospital - i won't give the name of the hospital (or even whether it's near a green valley or a brown city) because i have been threatened with a lawsuit for speaking the truth - i started a few petitions online about SEXISM being alive and well at the pet hospital (there are 13 vaginas and 0 men working there), and they got a lawyer to threaten me with "legal action" after i made "false, defamatory, disparaging" comments on the online petitions - there was nothing false about my labeling as "sexist," a hospital which employs 13 vaginas and 0 men - and though i may have made a ton of "defamatory and disparaging" comments about females in general, the comments were all opinion
"One thing is for certain: if your customer is simply expressing an opinion, or if what they are saying is simply true, a defamation lawsuit will fail. Opinions and truthful statements are protected" - Cynthia Hsu, Esq. on June 30, 2011 5:43 AM
i picked that quote up from some website - i will proceed to copy and paste the original petition (edited to remove the name/location of the hospital), along with a letter to the lawyer who threatened me with "legal action"
-----------------------------------------
from the desk of www.strongwomen.info:
should i ask my congresswoman about what should happen to a vet's office with a staff consisting of 13 men?
i am writing because, in this day and age, sexism should not be a part of any doctor's office. i am violated every time i walk into my doctor's office (it is actually a doctors' office), and even if i were to find and get services from another office which embraced diversity and tolerance, i'd know that there is one set of doctors who do not. i can't just ignore gender-based intolerance, and therefore am writing to as many equality advocates as i can. i wouldn't mind seeing this place put out of business.
the vet's office i go to is a very sexist organization, seen from their website or from a simple entry into the place. NEWSFLASH: it is now 2013 and doctors no longer are of one specific gender - i don't assume anything regarding fetus-wide hips or broad/protective shoulders when i hear the word "doctor" - so i feel that the owner of the business only employs 12 other members OF HER OWN GENDER because she has sexist ideals and because she is spiteful that females must wear high-heeled shoes and shoulderpads to appear as relevant as men are. oh, she's probably spiteful that females must use chainsaws in lumberjack competitions, as well, but that's not saying anything about the "coney island hot dog-eating competition" having to add a "ladies' division" in order for the smaller (lesser) stomachs to triumph.
...that's not saying anything about gender-based sports teams and gender-based military requirements, gender-based poker nights at the casino or gender-based "do it HERself" workshops at the homo depot...
i feel that if there was ANY office which employed 13 men - and employed nobody to represent the gender that is not as tall/wide/strong/able to eat as much - then they'd be put out of business by boycotts or by feminists or by the equality police. it is incomprehensible that, in this day and age, there is such a sexist and bigoted business that is not being boycotted or exposed for the intolerance that their hiring practices spew.
if such blatant anti-man sexism should continue at businesses like this office, i fear that people will stop regarding wombn as members of the lesser gender - i feel that people will simply ignore the fact that females were designed for motherhood, despite how females bleed eggs from their wombs and spurt milk from their MOMmary glands. this will lead females to think that they are just as able as men are when it comes to their abilities to "protect and serve," when females are really only intended to "protect and serve" lunch. take a look at their backs (http://www.jaggedlittledyl.com/sitepics/pands.jpg"), for crying out loud.
i am writing because, in this day and age, sexism should not be a part of ANY professional office. i am violated every time i walk into the office, and even if i were to find another doctor who embraced diversity and tolerance, i'd know that there is one that does not.
i am writing because i feel it is my duty to expose sexism. i am writing so that activists will (through law or through boycotts) put them out of business unless they change their hiring practices.
thank you,
dylan terreri, i
sheldon cooper, ii
--------------------------
"When I'm hungry, I eat. When I'm thirsty, I drink. When I feel like saying something, I say it." - Madonna
www.jaggedlittledyl.com/essays
__________________
__________________
to scott, regarding the veterinary office:
hello, scott, this is a friendly letter (i apologize for the length, but there is just so much to say) in response to the letter of false accusations that i got from you. i have some questions that i would like answered that i will get to later, but i say "false accusations" because , after reading your letter, i felt like i was reprimanded simply because i regarded an office comprised of 13 wombs and no men as extremely sexist. hmn...you told me that the comments i posted online were "false, defamatory and disparaging". well, instead of hiring a lawyer to defend me against all of those irrational, self-denying and femininity-denying vaginal veterinarians, i thought i'd write to you so i could justify the legitimacy of what i wrote.
in short, it is wrong to be claiming that my accusations are "false, defamatory and disparaging" when my accusations are true and can easily be justified by a 5 year-old. i will explain that statement after i tell you that i have written similar letters to other businesses which have offended me with their bias towards men - and nobody was insecure enough to get a lawyer after me. i don't have the patience to start an actual boycott, too much time and focus is involved (i am brain-damaged, for crying out loud, i can't do big things like organize a boycott), but i know that boycotts are started for a myriad of complaints against businesses. consumers who feel violated start boycotts via letters sent to people and organizations (although limbaugh's advertisers mostly came back, they did back off because of letters written by people who wanted to stop others from listening to his shows...their intention was to put "el rushbo" out of business). i also know that boycotts (public shaming of a company) are not illegal or grounds for a lawsuit, especially when the reasons for the boycott are true and can be justified by a 5 year-old. i am not organizing a boycott, but i feel that this company needs the same kind of public shaming.
"false, defamatory and disparaging". let me put these lies to rest. 1) there's nothing FALSE about regarding as "sexist," an office of 13 wombn and no men - it just makes sense to have this opinion if a customer takes notice of the people around him. here's a question for you: if i am wrong to think that i can't be sued for stating a fact about this veterinary hospital, why i am wrong? and why, if i am wrong to complain, are there websites like pissedconsumer.com and complaints.com?
2) saying that the hospital appears to be sexist is not defaming the practice or the competency of the doctors, ridiculing the gender of the doctors is not defaming the business practice of the hospital, so if DEFAMATION is an accusation then it's not related to the business (and it should not be handled by a lawyer writing on behalf on the business). furthermore, if any wombn feels DEFAMED by my stating the opinion that any female who hires 13 wombs and no men "has sexist ideals and is spiteful that females must wear high-heeled shoes and shoulderpads to appear as relevant as men are.," well then it simply wouldn't be rational for the female to feel defamed about being labeled a sexist because the female has no men working for her. it'd be like the pot taunting the kettle. if the womb was defamed by my suggesting that her overcompensating hiring practices might stem from the aforementioned overcompensating clothing., maybe she should seek counseling on how to stop overcompensating for (and learn to accept) her frail/female body. then she wouldn't feel defamed by her gender ("sad to be defeated by her own meek body," madonna crooned as evita), but if insulting the Strongwoman (who can't lift half as much as a man) is grounds for a lawsuit then why isn't anybody sued for insulting men every night on tv? that's another question to you, but in the words of genesis/phil collins, "this is the world we live in" - i hear man-bashing 24/7 on tv and news, music, etc, and therefore i am a wombn-basher because of the world we live in.
3) if any womb feels DISPARAGED or less worthy by my pointing out that females must use chainsaws in lumberjack competitions, or by my pointing out that the "coney island hot dog-eating competition" had to add a "ladies' division" in order for the smaller (lesser) stomachs to triumph, well then she must feel DISPARAGED about herself...and about femininity in general. again, this is not disparaging the practice of the business, i am just stating facts about gender - facts which are relevant to my complaint of the anti-man attitudes that exude from the veterinary hospital's unwillingness to make their workplace more diverse. these facts are relevant because in order for the reader to understand just why i am offended by anti-man sexism, i have to make it known just why attitudes of "female superiority" are not rational. this is why i say the following: if one gender wouldn't serve as a "handicap" to another gender, there would be as many gender-based sports teams as there are gender-based debate teams in high school. or gender-based quiz shows on television. yes, females do represent physical handicaps, look at the "parking for pregnant women" signs, it's elemental. how much can little unborn babies weigh, for crying out loud?
in order for the reader to understand just why i am offended by anti-man sexism, i have to make it known just why attitudes of "female superiority" are not rational when females relish in overcompensations like gender-based military requirements.
i was simply writing to relevant websites in an effort to have this hospital exposed for their discrimination and bigotry that is based on gender. this hospital employs 13 wombs - i've seen ONLY the lesser gender employed by the office whenever i've been there., employees are all female and are all proudly listed at their website.
this is sexism - and with a multitude of news stories relating to vaginas everywhere who are suing based on "lack of diversity," i believe that it's only logical for to me to speak out against society's omnipresent "wombn only" lack of diversity. if wombs are going to force the citidel and vmi (among other man-only establishments) to accept the smaller gender, i'm sure it's not unheard of for someone to complain about sexism. i have no desire to actively start a boycott, but please let me know if boycotts are illegal. please tell me if pissedconsumer.com and complaints.com are illegal, please tell me why a lawyer would contact me while these websites (and others like them) have not been shut down by the companies that are complained about. i have a right to complain about a company. people do it every day, on websites and through word-of-mouth. people complain about the quality of work done, for crying out loud, i'm only complaining about the apparent sexism. did i say 13 to 0 yet?
there is nothing false about saying that the place reeks of sexism. 13 wombs work there, no men at all, it's not anything but truth to call the vet who owns the place a SEXIST. i am offended by sexism, so i wrote to lawyers and other leaders because i feel violated by the veterinary hospital's sexism. i stated exactly how i feel about the sexism displayed by the hiring practices of the veterinary hospital, and how it makes ME feel when i go there. oh, it was not my choice to go there, one of my dogs had died and the emergency vet i went to had recommended the place in 2011 (and faxed my dogs' records to them). from day one, i felt compromised by the apparent sexism (they had one man working there in 2011, if he was gay then it'd just have added to the "no men allowed" aspect), but an emergency vet forwarded my dogs' records to the veterinary hospital. all of the information about simon (the dog that died), as well as how his sickness could relate to his brothers (alvin and theodore). i would not have continued to go to such a sexist vet if i thought it would be easy to switch vets, but there are too many records to transfer so i couldn't get a vet using the "trial and error" method. besides, i wanted to give the vaginas a chance to prove themselves as "strong". which didn't happen, by the way, because they contacted a lawyer after reading complaints from a "pissedconsumer.com". no, i didn't write to that website, but i am a pissed consumer. i am angry at their sexism and at how they contacted a lawyer for reporting their sexism (or for belittling their puny gender, i'm not sure which they are whining about).
it has been my experience that females are spiteful of being lesser than men. men are taller, broader, stronger, able to eat more...it has been my experience that females are spiteful that mens' broad shoulders name men as "protectors" while females' broad hips (and MOMmary glands) name wombn as "mothers". i realize how my experiences have shaped me into quite a politically-incorrect thinker, but i would like to know how on earth i could be sued for writing a letter of complaint regarding the sexism (13 wombs, no men) at the hospital. i realize how my letter to the hospital could have been regarded as "insulting" by those who are insulted by femininity, but 13 wombs and 0 men IS sexism and it IS what makes my accusations OF sexism not false. the only disparaging and defaming in my letter was related to the female gender. ridiculing someone based on their gender is not grounds for a lawsuit, either, especially when i didn't address my letters of complaint to the sexist company which you are representing. did i say 13 mammaries and 0 testosterone?
this is how i feel. apparently the vaginas are eternally children on a schoolyard, because they had the principal send a letter to my home. they are a bunch of self-piteous egg-leakers who have offended me with their anti-man sexism, i find it reprehensible that they have called a lawyer to complain about my exposing it. 13 vaginas and no men. i hope i have not offended anyone reading this letter, but in order for the reader to understand just why i am offended by anti-man sexism, i have to make it known just why attitudes of "female superiority" are not rational.
dylan terreri, i
sheldon cooper, ii
www.jaggedlittledyl.com
www.jaggedlittledyl.com is my stand in the battle against intolerance!
to my gay brethren:
i have never contacted before, but i got your email address from a website devoted to the gay "GLADD" organization. i'd just like to sing the praises of being gay to other gay people. to shout it again from the highest mountain and to as many people as i can reach. this letter is halfway stream-of-consciousness, it will get into murder and rape, not so much hannibalism, but i'm only trying to expand on who i am. you see, i thirst to try on new identities like some people thirst for knowledge, and i am always on a quest to broaden my identity, so i'd expect that the identities i'd like to try on would not be judged by the very people who supported chastity bono in her identity-crisis that led her to mutilate herself as if gender is a piece of clothing.
first of all, i love being gay. i've loved madonna since 1984. sometimes, i just want to write to gay organizations so that i can share my experiences. i love being gay. in fact, it was more than a few years ago when i declared the following to myself in realization of why "gay" is a synonym for "happy"...
1) i love going out because i love to be around other gay people
2) i love gay.com and my other "social networking" accounts because they get me social and they put me in contact with other gay people
3) i love sex
4) i don't care that i'm not attracted to females
now, years later and as a 38 year-old man, i can honestly say that being gay is the best thing that's happened to me, simply because straight men are nowhere near the type of person that they're attracted to.. gay "men," and i use that word loosely, are (at least) masculine and therefore have the potential to turn into the man of their dreams. now, after decades of being a total masculivoid and yearning for relations with the men who i saw as the "most ut," as judy jetson used to say, i have become the utmost and i am all the man that i need...and therefore...
1) i've replaced going out with staying in because i am interesting enough to keep myself entertained - and being around my own masculine presence gives me the feeling of completion that i once would only be able to get from being around "real men".
2) i love "social networking" and all of my facebook accounts because i can taunt gay "men" with the words "are you man enough to be your man," much like i taunt the "anything a man can do" type of Strongwoman when, no matter what she says she can do, she still relies on gender-based sports teams and gender-based military requirements. something like "anything a man can do, as long as she's not competing against a man"
3) i've replaced sex with masturbation because, although masturbation also puts naked men on pedestals (and reminds me of the fact that, in comparison, i am somewhat of a masculine slight), there is no poop on my penis once i ejaculate.
4) i still don't care that i'm not attracted to females
i would always say that "being gay is the best thing that's ever happened to me" when i was younger, kind of as a defense-mechanism for my hurt pride, but i really didn't know anything else - being gay was not an option i explored alternatives to. being gay just happened to me after years of feeling somewhat less than masculine. eureka, what a total shocker, i felt like a masculivoid and so i searched for masculinity to make me feel complete. oh, i won't bore myself by writing about my overprotective mother and my absent father, gay activists have made it as plain as day that the roles of my parents had nothing to do with my growing up to use men as a crutch in my quest for a sense of completion. they have made it as plain as day that my upbringing had nothing to do with the either the gender of the crutch or the reason i did not feel complete without one.
as i was saying - i used to say "being gay is the best thing that's ever happened to me" all of the time. it was a stupid thing to say back then and it was not really justifiable with any knowledge of being straight, but the reason i can say it (and mean it) now is because i know that a desire for women would get me looking for the woman of my dreams every night. without one, without a woman, i'd be beat, incomplete - kind of like how madonna described herself in her 1984 release of her first #1 hit entitled "like a virgin".
i am the man of my dreams, i've found the man of my dreams, there is no such thing as the woman of my dreams because i don't think much of people who can't exercise with a 100-pound barbell. seriously, though, a "real man" in my life is what fulfills me because the bruised esteem given to me by other boys on the schoolyard ("you throw like a girl," and "you're a little wimp," etc) during my childhood had established my identity as that of a masculivoid. furthermore, i can say that i WAS beat, incomplete...but not that i AM beat, incomplete. i am the man of my dreams, and while there is a more perfect specimen of manhood around every corner...well, that's just a matter of the masculine delusions i've had since childhood - the delusions regarding chest hair and muscle. the fact remains, though, that i do not need a crutch to get me through my semi-charmed kind of masculine existence. that's because my masculine existence is not semi-charmed. i guess i got a tip from dr. frank-n-furter, who built the man of his dreams in a laboratory, but i built the man of my dreams in my room. er, i guess i "write the gay away" on the computer in my room, but it was in my greenhouse where i built the kind of muscles on myself that i would previously envy and worship on other men. in my greenhouse is where i "exercise the gay away," enough to stop regarding strong men as "real men," enough to stop classifying them as divine, untouchable or out of my league . i lift weights and i swim in my greenhouse...as well as sing and do water-aerobics with the 80s/90s music. now, prince sung "sometimes it snows in april," and the greenhouse lets me swim all year long...but as for water-aerobics and madonna...well, sometimes i vogue in april.
anyway, being the man of my dreams and being attracted to men keeps me from wanting to have sex with anyone. you see, if i was attracted to females then i surely wouldn't be woman enough to be my woman. i am therefore so thankful that my past life of not being my own masculine epitome has led me to function as a crooked "man" rather than as a straight man, because if i had a sexual appetite for anything but men...then being the only man for me wouldn't save me from a life of wanting sex with other people.
i can hear it now, people taking issue with an unused homosexual attraction. hmn, now i'm thinking...madonna had a lyric...and it goes something like this: "there's a certain satisfaction in a little bit of pain". well, there's a certain satisfaction i get when i fantasize of inflicting pain upon certain democrats i have spoken to.. i guess the rest of the gay community would tell me that christianity is bad because it keeps me from doing what i want to do. hmn...now i'm thinking...should i do more than tell people what i want, what i really-really want? oh, who am i kidding, i don't really want to harm a democrat. i don't really want to be (yet another) man to overpower a Strongwoman and rape her - these are just fantasies that i wouldn't enjoy if i actually started doing them. "how do you know you won't like it if you've never tried it," i hear the community say. hmn...now i'm thinking...i've tried being in bed with men - this is true and it's why i choose porn and masturbation. eureka, is my true identity that of a murdering rapist - will i never be sure unless i step inside the shoes of a murdering rapist? i wouldn't know the first thing about killing people, but i've never tried it...so maybe i can't say that i don't like it. after all, some people get enjoyment from it. some people even get sexual enjoyment from murdering people, even if rape isn't involved. gee, i really liked "the silence of the lambs". hmn, now i'm thinking about my true identity. and why shouldn't i be, why should the gay community take issue with my questioning my own identity - isn't that what they encourage? ("you'll never know that you don't like it if you don't try it," stop whispering in my ear, mr. lecter, or i'll snort more cocaine to drown your voice out) i've never done anything like george huguely did, so i guess i can't really say with any knowledge that i wouldn't like it. maybe it's my true identity.
i apologize for that look inside my mind. i can't keep snorting when i'm trying to write something...i get so unfocused. let me hold off on rape and get back to the previous topic of having sex with people. i don't like putting people on pedestals, i don't like putting body parts (naughty or otherwise) on pedestals, and if i am going to do it then i'd want to get it done as quickly as possible. enter masturbation, bed-humping, shampoo-lube in the shower, anything but sharing a bed. i know that michael jackson said "what's wrong with sharing your bed," and it's fine as long as nobody's naked...but naivete just slaps me in the face when i've got either my fist or my penis up someone's ass. usually, naivete slaps me in the face when the aforementioned parts of my body exit the ass with a smelly, brown coating over parts of them.
i'll maintain that i'm proud to be gay, but the pride lies in not being attracted to females. i'm proud that i am attracted to masculine images, that is gay, but i'm also proud that i don't feel slight enough as a man to want to snuggle up to and have sex with the personifications of the masculine images that i am sexually attracted to. hmn, if i'm too proud to snuggle up to men like i'm some kind of bottom-feeding/ass-kissing masculine insufficiency, then i must not be proud to be gay...rather, i must be TOO proud to be gay. too proud a man to go for second-best. ha. whatever the case, i feel that i owe the gay community my gratitude...for if it wasn't for the apparent gender-naivete of "men" who go gaga for masculinity (i've seen them in strip bars, cheering and screaming in praise of the naked, beefy and studly musclemen). then i might have had no reason to change myself so that i wasn't like gay people. the truth is, i just couldn't love or respect myself if i was as much of a blank genderivoid as the "men" in the strip clubs who see a discovery zone in other men and embrace it. i do see self-respect as respect of the actual reality of the gender that's physically a part of the self that wants to be respected, i don't see self-respect as respect of the impressionable reality of someone's answer to the question "who do you think you are". in other words, a man is a man and if a man would start to sing a song like "man! i feel like a woman," instead of chuck berry's penis-affirming "my ding-a-ling," then the man has gender-identity issues (issues with who he is) and he would certainly not be respecting the man he is by becoming a woman. let me explain why...
gender is the reality that birth bestows upon someone gender-identity is the reality that doesn't develop until one can form opinions about oneself in relation to the world (and genders) around him. "who do you think you are" is not a therapeutic question that should be asked by a therapist in an effort to determine if someone needs a sex-change operation. the truth is that anyone who wants a sex-change operation needs to see a therapist for help in accepting reality, because the acceptance of one's reality is both the acceptance of self and the acceptance of one's eye color and one's shoe size..and one's physical gender. self-acceptance will never tell a man to change his gender. self-acceptance will not allow impressions of the world around a man to lead him to believe that he was not "supposed to be" a man. if reality isn't black and white, then it's certainly red and green and blue...and one's reality should not be tainted by any secondary colors produced by society mixing their many rainbows of diverse views in. this "rainbow of diversity" reminds me of a webpage i once made - a whistling wind is heard as these words appear on the screen: "your mind is so open, i can hear it from here".
some people say that you can't "pray the gay away," even when some christians have "prayed the gay away". some people say that it doesn't snow in april, even if other people have seen "april showers" replaced by "april snowflakes". now, madonna once sung a song called "justify my love," and that's what i do. i justify my lusts by reasoning with myself enough to "reason the gay away". let me just say that i get very angry when it comes to limitations regarding the amount of money i can put into slot machines. likewise, i get very angry when it comes to limitations i'm thought to have by people who think sexual preferences are as unchangeable as the current time. it's actually quite ridiculous for gay activists to accept and even embrace the ex-heterosexuals with the line "you're realizing your true self," while labeling the ex-gay crowd as either "self-loathing," "brainwashed," or "sexually confused" in an effort to shield their prides with the words "he wasn't really gay". well, these defenses of homosexuality can also be called "grasping at straws" or "seeing what sticks" - so, for the next few paragraphs and as an effort to paint the straw-grasping activists as incredulous, i would like to employ the same kind of "grasping" tactics to mock the gays who are apt to put limitations on me and on the sexuality of heterosexual wannabees.
some say that my unwillingness to relish in homosexuality labels me a "closeted homosexual," but i'd ask the activists if a lack of genuine interest in gay sex would make or break that label. furthermore, if the reality of a homosexual attraction should relegate a man to a life of gay sex, mister activist, then why shouldn't the reality of a masculine body relegate a man to a life of no sex-change operation? if i have a sexually open mind paired with lots of practice cultivating my erection through use of playgirl magazine, would that make me a non-practiced bisexual who didn't practice with playboy magazine because the gay-affirming media told him not to? and should i not be relegated to a life of gay sex if i was only playing by the rules of a gay-affirming society when i would give myself "practice sex" only with gay porn? if i have a sexually open mind that's disgusted by and strays from sweat, saliva, lunch-breath , gamy armpits, gamy asses and unfirm behinds...am i lying about the identity of the man i am by continuing the sex-act when i'm not attracted to my partner like i was before we undressed and got into bed? am i lying to myself and denying my true identity by continuing the sex-act when all i want to do is leave - even if i had no clothes and i had to hitchhike naked like madonna did in her 1992 book called SEX?
having watched many different news stories, i feel like i am correct to say that gay activists would call me "brainwashed" and have my psychiatrist fired if he scared the homosexual right out of me with "negative reinforcements" like electric shocks and horrible smells. well, where do gay activists stand with regards to gay porn? there is no such thing as "smellovision," and therefore anyone who gets hooked on gay porn is only being subject to half of the gay sexperience. now, if gay activists would have a psychiatrist fired for "shocking" the gay lust out of somebody, would they sue a porn studio for presenting human bodies in a positive light without any reminders of dung or sweat? i ask this because i developed slowly and i had always looked with envy upon images of hairy, masculine armpits. they have been a favorite of mine since i was 10 years old, i'd seen them on tv and in movies and on my friends - and i'd never gotten close to one until recently. you see, i was actually looking up at a masculine, hairy armpit about two feet away from my face - and the realization of the sweat and grime had totally turned me off. all the porn movies that i'd seen would present armpits in a favorable light, leaving me anticipating the day i'd be able to put my face inside one and just realize my fantasy. let me ask a question: if i was turned off by the reality of armpits - if the fantasy of armpits was cultivated for years with non-offending pictures of clean and dry armpits - would gay activists sue porn studios for portraying armpits as something for gay "men" to relish in when the realization of the reality of armpits can be as competent a "negative reinforcement" as an electric shock is? would gay activists sue movie studios for contributing to the allure of manly and hairy armpits if the reality of manly and hairy armpits may produce an effect that is quite similar to that of the shock therapy that "shocks the gay away"? why should they ban gay-to-straight "conversion therapy" if it's only given by a doctor? if they're gonna ban doctors from changing my mind, from changing the way i think...then why don't they ban movie studios from portraying gay sex as alluring, when gay sex in reality involves enough smelly *******s and poop-residue to get homosexuals to (in the classic words of michael jackson) "make that change".
the preceding is an example of using bull**** to "grasp at straws" and reach a desired conclusion, much like how the ex-gay crowd is belittled by gay activists who use bull**** (assumptions) to label them as "confused" or "self-loathing". i, too, can throw bull**** to see what sticks. keep calling me "brainwashed" and "sexually confused" with no real knowledge of anything, i will throw your straw-grasping back in your face with MY straw-grasping . as for now, well, it's late. wow, i didn't intend this letter to get as wordy as it has become. i must apologize.
"have i said too much? there's nothing more i can think of to say to you" - madonna
dylan terreri, i
www.homosexualityiswrong.com
www.jaggedlittledyl.com/essays
i don't know how to begin this letter, so i will just state my feelings
and go from there. i believe i am a frog, i believe that i was born in
the wrong body. i am sexually attracted to miss piggy, i just know that
i am meant to be a frog, but i am met with so much opposition wherever i
go. people actually have the nerve to tell me that there is something
wrong with me for thinking this way, people have the nerve to recommend
psychologists and different forms of head-therapy. the bottom line is
that people have the nerve to think that there is something wrong with
me just because i always maintain that i was born in the wrong body.
they don't know me, who are they to judge, who are they to tell me that
my mind needs repair because it can't accept reality? what is reality,
anyway, is reality a matter of what IS...or is reality a matter of the
way i feel? is "who i am" a matter of the physical...or is "who i am" a
matter of the impressions of my mind? nonetheless, i have the identity
of a frog and people can tell me that it is wrong, but i won't believe
them.
i don't know how to continue this letter, so i will just state my
feelings and go from there. i believe i am an 8 year-old boy, i believe
that i should not be regarded as a man. i am sexually attracted to
young girls, i just know that i am meant to be an 8 year-old but i am
met with so much opposition wherever i go. people actually have the
nerve to think that there is something wrong with me just because i
always maintain that i am living in the wrong body. they don't know me,
who are they to judge, who are they to tell me that my mind needs
repair because it can't accept reality? what is reality, anyway, is
reality a matter of what IS...or is reality a matter of the way i feel?
is "who i am" a matter of the physical...or is "who i am" a matter of
the impressions of my mind? nonetheless, i have the identity of an 8
year-old and people can tell me that it's wrong, but i won't believe
them.
i don't know how to continue this letter, so i will just state my
feelings and go from there. i believe i have magic powers, i believe
that voodoo will make me win $1,000,000,000 on the slot machines after i
spend an unknown amount. i can do anything with my magic powers, i
have the identity of samantha stevens and people can tell me that it's
wrong - i won't believe them.
i believe that i am a fish and that i can live underwater. it's my
identity and people can tell me that i'm wrong - i won't believe them. i
believe that i'm not supposed to have thumbs, it's my identity. i
believe that i'm supposed to have a tail to wag, it's my identity.
everything i believe about myself, i have believed for as long as i can
remember. therefore i was BORN THIS WAY. people can tell me that i'm
wrong, i won't believe them. i don't want any kind of "head therapy," i
just want to keep on living in what society may see as my own
delusional world. if i go to jail, maybe they will pay for the
operation to turn me into a fish or a frog. i hear they're paying for
the "sex change" surgery.
dylan terreri, i
www.jaggedlittledyl.com
i'd just like to sing the praises of being gay to other gay people. to shout it again from the highest mountain and to as many people as i can reach. this letter is halfway stream-of-consciousness, it will get into murder and rape, not so much hannibalism, but i'm only trying to expand on who i am. you see, i thirst to try on new identities like some people thirst for knowledge, and i am always on a quest to broaden my identity, so i'd expect that the identities i'd like to try on would not be judged by the very people who supported chastity bono in her identity-crisis that led her to mutilate herself as if gender is a piece of clothing.
first of all, i love being gay. i've loved madonna since 1984. sometimes, i just want to write to gay organizations so that i can share my experiences. i love being gay. in fact, it was more than a few years ago when i declared the following to myself in realization of why "gay" is a synonym for "happy"...
1) i love going out because i love to be around other gay people
2) i love gay.com and my other "social networking" accounts because they get me social and they put me in contact with other gay people
3) i love sex
4) i don't care that i'm not attracted to females
now, years later and as a 38 year-old man, i can honestly say that being gay is the best thing that's happened to me, simply because straight men are nowhere near the type of person that they're attracted to.. gay "men," and i use that word loosely, are (at least) masculine and therefore have the potential to turn into the man of their dreams. now, after decades of being a total masculivoid and yearning for relations with the men who i saw as the "most ut," as judy jetson used to say, i have become the utmost and i am all the man that i need...and therefore...
1) i've replaced going out with staying in because i am interesting enough to keep myself entertained - and being around my own masculine presence gives me the feeling of completion that i once would only be able to get from being around "real men".
2) i love "social networking" and all of my facebook accounts because i can taunt gay "men" with the words "are you man enough to be your man," much like i taunt the "anything a man can do" type of Strongwoman when, no matter what she says she can do, she still relies on gender-based sports teams and gender-based military requirements. something like "anything a man can do, as long as she's not competing against a man"
3) i've replaced sex with masturbation because, although masturbation also puts naked men on pedestals (and reminds me of the fact that, in comparison, i am somewhat of a masculine slight), there is no poop on my penis once i ejaculate.
4) i still don't care that i'm not attracted to females
i would always say that "being gay is the best thing that's ever happened to me" when i was younger, kind of as a defense-mechanism for my hurt pride, but i really didn't know anything else - being gay was not an option i explored alternatives to. being gay just happened to me after years of feeling somewhat less than masculine. eureka, what a total shocker, i felt like a masculivoid and so i searched for masculinity to make me feel complete. oh, i won't bore myself by writing about my overprotective mother and my absent father, gay activists have made it as plain as day that the roles of my parents had nothing to do with my growing up to use men as a crutch in my quest for a sense of completion. they have made it as plain as day that my upbringing had nothing to do with the either the gender of the crutch or the reason i did not feel complete without one.
as i was saying - i used to say "being gay is the best thing that's ever happened to me" all of the time. it was a stupid thing to say back then and it was not really justifiable with any knowledge of being straight, but the reason i can say it (and mean it) now is because i know that a desire for women would get me looking for the woman of my dreams every night. without one, without a woman, i'd be beat, incomplete - kind of like how madonna described herself in her 1984 release of her first #1 hit entitled "like a virgin".
i am the man of my dreams, i've found the man of my dreams, there is no such thing as the woman of my dreams because i don't think much of people who can't exercise with a 100-pound barbell. seriously, though, a "real man" in my life is what fulfills me because the bruised esteem given to me by other boys on the schoolyard ("you throw like a girl," and "you're a little wimp," etc) during my childhood had established my identity as that of a masculivoid. furthermore, i can say that i WAS beat, incomplete...but not that i AM beat, incomplete. i am the man of my dreams, and while there is a more perfect specimen of manhood around every corner...well, that's just a matter of the masculine delusions i've had since childhood - the delusions regarding chest hair and muscle. the fact remains, though, that i do not need a crutch to get me through my semi-charmed kind of masculine existence. that's because my masculine existence is not semi-charmed. i guess i got a tip from dr. frank-n-furter, who built the man of his dreams in a laboratory, but i built the man of my dreams in my room. er, i guess i "write the gay away" on the computer in my room, but it was in my greenhouse where i built the kind of muscles on myself that i would previously envy and worship on other men. in my greenhouse is where i "exercise the gay away," enough to stop regarding strong men as "real men," enough to stop classifying them as divine, untouchable or out of my league . i lift weights and i swim in my greenhouse...as well as sing and do water-aerobics with the 80s/90s music. now, prince sung "sometimes it snows in april," and the greenhouse lets me swim all year long...but as for water-aerobics and madonna...well, sometimes i vogue in april.
anyway, being the man of my dreams and being attracted to men keeps me from wanting to have sex with anyone. you see, if i was attracted to females then i surely wouldn't be woman enough to be my woman. i am therefore so thankful that my past life of not being my own masculine epitome has led me to function as a crooked "man" rather than as a straight man, because if i had a sexual appetite for anything but men...then being the only man for me wouldn't save me from a life of wanting sex with other people.
i can hear it now, people taking issue with an unused homosexual attraction. hmn, now i'm thinking...madonna had a lyric...and it goes something like this: "there's a certain satisfaction in a little bit of pain". well, there's a certain satisfaction i get when i fantasize of inflicting pain upon certain democrats i have spoken to.. i guess the rest of the gay community would tell me that christianity is bad because it keeps me from doing what i want to do. hmn...now i'm thinking...should i do more than tell people what i want, what i really-really want? oh, who am i kidding, i don't really want to harm a democrat. i don't really want to be (yet another) man to overpower a Strongwoman and rape her - these are just fantasies that i wouldn't enjoy if i actually started doing them. "how do you know you won't like it if you've never tried it," i hear the community say. hmn...now i'm thinking...i've tried being in bed with men - this is true and it's why i choose porn and masturbation. eureka, is my true identity that of a murdering rapist - will i never be sure unless i step inside the shoes of a murdering rapist? i wouldn't know the first thing about killing people, but i've never tried it...so maybe i can't say that i don't like it. after all, some people get enjoyment from it. some people even get sexual enjoyment from murdering people, even if rape isn't involved. gee, i really liked "the silence of the lambs". hmn, now i'm thinking about my true identity. and why shouldn't i be, why should the gay community take issue with my questioning my own identity - isn't that what they encourage? ("you'll never know that you don't like it if you don't try it," stop whispering in my ear, mr. lecter, or i'll snort more cocaine to drown your voice out) i've never done anything like george huguely did, so i guess i can't really say with any knowledge that i wouldn't like it. maybe it's my true identity.
i apologize for that look inside my mind. i can't keep snorting when i'm trying to write something...i get so unfocused. let me hold off on rape and get back to the previous topic of having sex with people. i don't like putting people on pedestals, i don't like putting body parts (naughty or otherwise) on pedestals, and if i am going to do it then i'd want to get it done as quickly as possible. enter masturbation, bed-humping, shampoo-lube in the shower, anything but sharing a bed. i know that michael jackson said "what's wrong with sharing your bed," and it's fine as long as nobody's naked...but naivete just slaps me in the face when i've got either my fist or my penis up someone's ass. usually, naivete slaps me in the face when the aforementioned parts of my body exit the ass with a smelly, brown coating over parts of them.
i'll maintain that i'm proud to be gay, but the pride lies in not being attracted to females. i'm proud that i am attracted to masculine images, that is gay, but i'm also proud that i don't feel slight enough as a man to want to snuggle up to and have sex with the personifications of the masculine images that i am sexually attracted to. hmn, if i'm too proud to snuggle up to men like i'm some kind of bottom-feeding/ass-kissing masculine insufficiency, then i must not be proud to be gay...rather, i must be TOO proud to be gay. too proud a man to go for second-best. ha. whatever the case, i feel that i owe the gay community my gratitude...for if it wasn't for the apparent gender-naivete of "men" who go gaga for masculinity (i've seen them in strip bars, cheering and screaming in praise of the naked, beefy and studly musclemen). then i might have had no reason to change myself so that i wasn't like gay people. the truth is, i just couldn't love or respect myself if i was as much of a blank genderivoid as the "men" in the strip clubs who see a discovery zone in other men and embrace it. i do see self-respect as respect of the actual reality of the gender that's physically a part of the self that wants to be respected, i don't see self-respect as respect of the impressionable reality of someone's answer to the question "who do you think you are". in other words, a man is a man and if a man would start to sing a song like "man! i feel like a woman," instead of chuck berry's penis-affirming "my ding-a-ling," then the man has gender-identity issues (issues with who he is) and he would certainly not be respecting the man he is by becoming a woman. let me explain why...
gender is the reality that birth bestows upon someone gender-identity is the reality that doesn't develop until one can form opinions about oneself in relation to the world (and genders) around him. "who do you think you are" is not a therapeutic question that should be asked by a therapist in an effort to determine if someone needs a sex-change operation. the truth is that anyone who wants a sex-change operation needs to see a therapist for help in accepting reality, because the acceptance of one's reality is both the acceptance of self and the acceptance of one's eye color and one's shoe size..and one's physical gender. self-acceptance will never tell a man to change his gender. self-acceptance will not allow impressions of the world around a man to lead him to believe that he was not "supposed to be" a man. if reality isn't black and white, then it's certainly red and green and blue...and one's reality should not be tainted by any secondary colors produced by society mixing their many rainbows of diverse views in. this "rainbow of diversity" reminds me of a webpage i once made - a whistling wind is heard as these words appear on the screen: "your mind is so open, i can hear it from here".
some people say that you can't "pray the gay away," even when some christians have "prayed the gay away". some people say that it doesn't snow in april, even if other people have seen "april showers" replaced by "april snowflakes". now, madonna once sung a song called "justify my love," and that's what i do. i justify my lusts by reasoning with myself enough to "reason the gay away". let me just say that i get very angry when it comes to limitations regarding the amount of money i can put into slot machines. likewise, i get very angry when it comes to limitations i'm thought to have by people who think sexual preferences are as unchangeable as the current time. it's actually quite ridiculous for gay activists to accept and even embrace the ex-heterosexuals with the line "you're realizing your true self," while labeling the ex-gay crowd as either "self-loathing," "brainwashed," or "sexually confused" in an effort to shield their prides with the words "he wasn't really gay". well, these defenses of homosexuality can also be called "grasping at straws" or "seeing what sticks" - so, for the next few paragraphs and as an effort to paint the straw-grasping activists as incredulous, i would like to employ the same kind of "grasping" tactics to mock the gays who are apt to put limitations on me and on the sexuality of heterosexual wannabees.
some say that my unwillingness to relish in homosexuality labels me a "closeted homosexual," but i'd ask the activists if a lack of genuine interest in gay sex would make or break that label. furthermore, if the reality of a homosexual attraction should relegate a man to a life of gay sex, mister activist, then why shouldn't the reality of a masculine body relegate a man to a life of no sex-change operation? if i have a sexually open mind paired with lots of practice cultivating my erection through use of playgirl magazine, would that make me a non-practiced bisexual who didn't practice with playboy magazine because the gay-affirming media told him not to? and should i not be relegated to a life of gay sex if i was only playing by the rules of a gay-affirming society when i would give myself "practice sex" only with gay porn? if i have a sexually open mind that's disgusted by and strays from sweat, saliva, lunch-breath , gamy armpits, gamy asses and unfirm behinds...am i lying about the identity of the man i am by continuing the sex-act when i'm not attracted to my partner like i was before we undressed and got into bed? am i lying to myself and denying my true identity by continuing the sex-act when all i want to do is leave - even if i had no clothes and i had to hitchhike naked like madonna did in her 1992 book called SEX?
having watched many different news stories, i feel like i am correct to say that gay activists would call me "brainwashed" and have my psychiatrist fired if he scared the homosexual right out of me with "negative reinforcements" like electric shocks and horrible smells. well, where do gay activists stand with regards to gay porn? there is no such thing as "smellovision," and therefore anyone who gets hooked on gay porn is only being subject to half of the gay sexperience. now, if gay activists would have a psychiatrist fired for "shocking" the gay lust out of somebody, would they sue a porn studio for presenting human bodies in a positive light without any reminders of dung or sweat? i ask this because i developed slowly and i had always looked with envy upon images of hairy, masculine armpits. they have been a favorite of mine since i was 10 years old, i'd seen them on tv and in movies and on my friends - and i'd never gotten close to one until recently. you see, i was actually looking up at a masculine, hairy armpit about two feet away from my face - and the realization of the sweat and grime had totally turned me off. all the porn movies that i'd seen would present armpits in a favorable light, leaving me anticipating the day i'd be able to put my face inside one and just realize my fantasy. let me ask a question: if i was turned off by the reality of armpits - if the fantasy of armpits was cultivated for years with non-offending pictures of clean and dry armpits - would gay activists sue porn studios for portraying armpits as something for gay "men" to relish in when the realization of the reality of armpits can be as competent a "negative reinforcement" as an electric shock is? would gay activists sue movie studios for contributing to the allure of manly and hairy armpits if the reality of manly and hairy armpits may produce an effect that is quite similar to that of the shock therapy that "shocks the gay away"? why should they ban gay-to-straight "conversion therapy" if it's only given by a doctor? if they're gonna ban doctors from changing my mind, from changing the way i think...then why don't they ban movie studios from portraying gay sex as alluring, when gay sex in reality involves enough smelly *******s and poop-residue to get homosexuals to (in the classic words of michael jackson) "make that change".
the preceding is an example of using bull**** to "grasp at straws" and reach a desired conclusion, much like how the ex-gay crowd is belittled by gay activists who use bull**** (assumptions) to label them as "confused" or "self-loathing". i, too, can throw bull**** to see what sticks. keep calling me "brainwashed" and "sexually confused" with no real knowledge of anything, i will throw your straw-grasping back in your face with MY straw-grasping . as for now, well, it's late. wow, i didn't intend this letter to get as wordy as it has become. i must apologize.
"have i said too much? there's nothing more i can think of to say to you" - madonna
dylan terreri, i
www.homosexualityiswrong.com
www.jaggedlittledyl.com/essays
mike phelps spawned the use of my pool. i had it since 2004, never used it until 2008 when mike phelps became a household name. it's all because of him that i use my pool. i wrote a parody of kelly clarkson's "because of you" in honor of him. :)
i've written over 700 parodies, mostly politically-incorrect, they're all at my website, songparody.org. oh, the url in the picture also gets you to the same site.